| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 3 | |
| 1. |  | VÁZQUEZ, D.; BERGER, A. G.; CUNIBERTI, M.; BAINOTTI, C.; MIRANDA, M. Z. de; SCHEEREN, P. L.; JOBET, C.; ZÚÑIGA, J.; CABRERA, G.; VERGES, R.; JAVIER PENA, R. Influence of cultivar and environment on quality of Latin American wheats. Journal of Cereal Science, London, v. 6, n. 2, p. 196-203, Sep. 2012.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Trigo. |
|    |
| 2. | | PUNTEL, L. A.; BOLFE, E. L.; MELCHIORI, R. J. M.; ORTEGA, R.; TISCORNIA, G.; ROEL, A.; SCARAMUZZA, F.; BEST, S.; BERGER, A. G.; HANSEL, D. S. S.; PALACIOS, D. D.; BALBOA, G. How digital is agriculture in South America? Adoption and limitations. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRECISION AGRICULTURE, 15., 2022, Minneapolis. Proceedings... [Monticello]: International Society of Precision Agriculture, 2022. p. 1-10. ICPA 2022.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agricultura Digital. |
| |
| 3. | | PUNTEL, L. A.; BOLFE, E. L.; MELCHIORI, R. J. M.; ORTEGA, R.; TISCORNIA, G.; ROEL, A.; SCARAMUZZA, F.; BEST, S.; BERGER, A. G.; HANSEL, D. S. S.; DURÁN, D. P.; BALBOA, G. R. How digital is agriculture in a subset of countries from South America? Adoption and limitations. Crop & Pasture Science, 2022. 18 p. Special issue.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agricultura Digital. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 3 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital. |
|
Data corrente: |
29/06/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
29/06/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
PUNTEL, L. A.; BOLFE, E. L.; MELCHIORI, R. J. M.; ORTEGA, R.; TISCORNIA, G.; ROEL, A.; SCARAMUZZA, F.; BEST, S.; BERGER, A. G.; HANSEL, D. S. S.; PALACIOS, D. D.; BALBOA, G. |
|
Afiliação: |
University of Nebraska; EDSON LUIS BOLFE, CNPTIA, Unicamp; Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria EEA Paraná, Argentina; Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Santiago, Chile; Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, Las Brujas, Uruguay; Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, Treinta y Tres, Uruguay; Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria EEA Manfredi, Argentina; Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, Quilamapu, Chile; Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, Colonia, Uruguay; Droptec Agri, Santa Catarina; Colegio de Ingenieros Agronómos, Chile; University of Nebraska. |
|
Título: |
How digital is agriculture in South America? Adoption and limitations. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRECISION AGRICULTURE, 15., 2022, Minneapolis. Proceedings... [Monticello]: International Society of Precision Agriculture, 2022. |
|
Páginas: |
p. 1-10. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
ICPA 2022. |
|
Conteúdo: |
Abstract. A rapidly growing population in a context of land and water scarcity, and climate change has driven an increase in healthy, nutritious, and affordable food demand while maintaining the current cropping area. Digital agriculture (DA) can contribute solutions to meet the demands in an efficient and sustainable way. South America (SA) is one of the main grain and protein producers in the world but the status of DA in the region is unknown. Systematic review of official reports and surveys, literature, and case studies from Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, and Chile was conducted to address the following objectives: i) quantify adoption of existing DA technologies, ii) identify limitations for DA adoption, iii) summarize existing metrics to benchmark DA benefits. The Region of study showed to follow the same trend than the world on DA adoption. The level of adoption was led by Brazil and Argentina followed by Uruguay and Chile. The GPS guidance systems, mapping tools, mobile apps and remote sensing were the most adopted DA technologies in SA. While, technology cost, lack of training, limited number of companies providing services and unclear benefits from DA were the most reported limitations for adoption. Clear economic, social, and environmental metrics that track the benefits of DA could promote adoption as well as help benchmarking future research and extension projects. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Adoção de tecnologias de agricultura digital; Adoption; Agricultura digital; Digital agriculture; Internet das coisas; Internet of things; IoT; Sustainability; Sustentabilidade. |
|
Thesagro: |
Agricultura; Agricultura de Precisão. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Agriculture; Precision agriculture. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/1144364/1/PC-How-Digital-is-Agriculture-ICPA-2022.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02681nam a2200421 a 4500
001 2144364
005 2022-06-29
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aPUNTEL, L. A.
245 $aHow digital is agriculture in South America? Adoption and limitations.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRECISION AGRICULTURE, 15., 2022, Minneapolis. Proceedings... [Monticello]: International Society of Precision Agriculture$c2022
300 $ap. 1-10.
500 $aICPA 2022.
520 $aAbstract. A rapidly growing population in a context of land and water scarcity, and climate change has driven an increase in healthy, nutritious, and affordable food demand while maintaining the current cropping area. Digital agriculture (DA) can contribute solutions to meet the demands in an efficient and sustainable way. South America (SA) is one of the main grain and protein producers in the world but the status of DA in the region is unknown. Systematic review of official reports and surveys, literature, and case studies from Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, and Chile was conducted to address the following objectives: i) quantify adoption of existing DA technologies, ii) identify limitations for DA adoption, iii) summarize existing metrics to benchmark DA benefits. The Region of study showed to follow the same trend than the world on DA adoption. The level of adoption was led by Brazil and Argentina followed by Uruguay and Chile. The GPS guidance systems, mapping tools, mobile apps and remote sensing were the most adopted DA technologies in SA. While, technology cost, lack of training, limited number of companies providing services and unclear benefits from DA were the most reported limitations for adoption. Clear economic, social, and environmental metrics that track the benefits of DA could promote adoption as well as help benchmarking future research and extension projects.
650 $aAgriculture
650 $aPrecision agriculture
650 $aAgricultura
650 $aAgricultura de Precisão
653 $aAdoção de tecnologias de agricultura digital
653 $aAdoption
653 $aAgricultura digital
653 $aDigital agriculture
653 $aInternet das coisas
653 $aInternet of things
653 $aIoT
653 $aSustainability
653 $aSustentabilidade
700 1 $aBOLFE, E. L.
700 1 $aMELCHIORI, R. J. M.
700 1 $aORTEGA, R.
700 1 $aTISCORNIA, G.
700 1 $aROEL, A.
700 1 $aSCARAMUZZA, F.
700 1 $aBEST, S.
700 1 $aBERGER, A. G.
700 1 $aHANSEL, D. S. S.
700 1 $aPALACIOS, D. D.
700 1 $aBALBOA, G.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital (CNPTIA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
